Thread: Do you think TNA could beat WWE in ratings someday?
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2005, 09:31 PM   #18
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PureHatred
Both companies had shitty writing. Both companies were losing money, but seemed not to care because they had big companies bankrolling them. Both had shitty TV deals (remember, until September of 1995, WCW only had their Saturday Night TV show). And both were being killed by bookers who relied too much on guys that fanswere sick of seeing.

I know WCW was far more established and had more recognizable names. But I think there's a comparison to be made there.
And it's a weak comparison, because TNA would need to be touring and have a more recognisable roster/be a more established company before it could compete. WCW, crappy as it was doing, already HAD both.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote