Thread: Triple H injures neck at RAW
View Single Post
Old 04-16-2005, 10:38 AM   #95
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PureHatred
I know its an opinion thing, but you went out on a limb and said Trips was the best wrestler "by far."

You could argue that not only Angle, but Jericho, and maybe even Eddie Guerrero are better in the ring AND on the mic. And to be fair, you did say that you would lose respect "if" he used backstage politics. Then in your very next post you act like it's soo obvious he's playing the political game, etc....

Basically, you contradicted yourself which made your whole argument sound stupid.

Not to mention the whole "no one could carry his belt up until this point" which totally ignores the last couple of years n the WWE where Hunter buried Jericho, made Benoit's reign look insignificant, and killed off the heatthat his feuds with Booker T and Kane had by refusing to do the job. Oh yeah, and that whole ruining Goldberg's entire run in the WWE which should've made huge money and turned into a pointless joke.

I like some of Trips earlier work and he's still a capable heel; its just tiresome to have him dominating the show so much.
I want to see Hunter from 2000 or so back. He isn't and won't be the best, but he was watchable.

But I guess Olympic Hitman is right. I mean, no-one can carry his belt. Mostly because he's booking himself as unbeatable, but still.

And the fact that it makes his argument intellectually dishonest, on top of scattered and hipocritical is really meaningless.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote