Thread: Are we too critical?
View Single Post
Old 04-23-2005, 12:20 PM   #29
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOUR Hero
It seems unless you have an over name/character, it doesn't matter if you're misused or the result of bad backstage politics, to the casual fan, They don't care. Until casual fans are the minority instead of the majority, that's not going to change the way the business is run.
If the shows were all that good, I wouldn't even give a shit about misused talent.

I think the ratings reflect other people have an issue with the quality of the product. Whether or not it's because Matt or Rhyno or whoever else was fired (Which I doubt it is), ratings are nothing compared to what they were. So is it the overly critical smark-base that's the problem here, or perhaps the people who just want to casually enjoy it and then decide to check out CSI intead? OR perhaps it's too critical to say that "lower ratings means casual fans are less satisfied."
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote