Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ThugLife
I'm changing my view on the fact that maybe having 8 or 9 members isnt such a bad idea if they hired the right people-you've got a point there to be honest. But yeah there is another argument and that is one i just brought up. I am amazed at how stupid Vince can be with his decision making sometimes, er actually, maybe i shouldn't be?
|
Vince regretably is out of ideas and has been for a while, he admitted a few years back that he's lost touch with the audience and wasn't sure on what to give them. Since then the booking team has been like a revovling door with all the hollywood writers coming in and leaving along with Heyman, Pritchard and the list goes on.
There's been no real continuation in booking ideas and styles for a while now because of this, so the booking is going in different directions every couple of months which tends to rock the boat. Which is why i'm saying fewer bookers means a more controlled direction of the product. Yes the competition at the time could have also have helped this when the numbers were good as could a number of other factors, but we can't say for sure. Much in the same way we can't say that 2 guys booking would work well now, but no one can dissagree that the booking as a whole was better in 1999 compared to today.
I'm not just saying this for the WWE, on a much smaller scale i've worked in companies that try to have a few bookers and it doesn't work. From what i've seen.
Again just to clear this, this is an opinion, nothing I have said is fact.