Originally Posted by Kane Knight

You know, polar arguments like that are pretty one-sided. They sure are easy to win, but they're really not all that useful for determining information.

saying "I'd rather watch Crash Holly than HHH fuck a corpse" is much akin to "I'd rather eat Lima Beans than have a hole drilled into my stomach on a nightly basis."

You mean you'd rather watch a poor and overdone storyline than the one that sticks out in everyone's mind as the WORST angle in the last few years?

No offense, but:

Well No Shit!

My point here is that this is kinda a poor indication on how much or little you like it.

Quite frankly, I'd be happier with fresh angles than the usual "build a guy up for one month, drop him like a sack of shit the night after the PPV" deal. This isn't really new, with the exception of some rather superficial details. The Angle angle's okay, but has been a bit predictable too. It has the upside of not being a total cliché at this point though, so it gets more benefit of the doubt here.

The Brock-Holly thing is the sort of thing you always see as filler when they don't have a real storyline to cook up. The only real and significant difference here is that they have a slight reason to build this one up...After all, Holly had his neck broken. Still, it's a bandaid over a sucking chest wound.

I'd like to see fresh people come up to the main event. just...Not like this. This sorta "elevate 'em only to drop 'em" deal is a temporary fix, at best. It's like taking caffeine to stay awake. Short run, good. long run, no good. The problem is, they've used caffeine on me so much it's no longer effective...