Thread: Did Taker put Orton over?/How is it different? (Raw Spoilers)
View Single Post
Old 05-05-2005, 02:43 PM   #11
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corkscrewed
Definitely true, Cynick. But I think this discussion just confines things to one match just to analyze that. And within those contraints, everything that's been here is valid. The match itself was amazing, back and forth, where anyone could have won. Shelton lost only due to a brazen "rookie" mistake that the veteran exploited. Therefore, Shelton is on HBK's level except for experience, which is a given.

Then ending, with the concern stuff and the helping out also played a huge part.

So old history aside, HBK did a tremendous job of putting Benjamin over. I guess he has changed.... hopefully that's the case at least.
You're right. The purview of the thread was specifically hwther or not they were put over match for match, not whether they were getting a push.

Nobody can control tomorrow (Well, none of us can), but the question of the here and now can be focused on. Any pushed wrestler can be dropped at any time, so I'm not going to worry about that. The question is "Did Michaels/Taker put Benjamin/Orton over," not "will the WWE waste this?"
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote