Thread: Batista in a fight with a kickboxer?
View Single Post
Old 05-11-2005, 02:57 PM   #27
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashnburn
Actually most martial arts don't teach ground fighting techniques so once you get inside their kicking and punching zone and take them down to the ground they don't know what to do. For example if you watch the first few UFC ppv's (before they instituted weight classes, time limits, rounds, and before everybody new 5 different fighting styles) the grappler in the fight almost always won. Guys like Royce Gracie would beat powerful strikers like Tank Abbott because they always took them down to the ground.
Kickboxing is no exception, either.

A correction though, most martial arts do teach some level of dealing with an opponent on the ground, just not enough to be effective with the whole "striker/grappler" issue. There are also arts that teach a lot of "mat moves," but for the most part, you're right. Most of them do not. Many of them are even weak in a clinch

However, they're great if you can stay horizontal in a fight and keep your opponent from clinching you.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote