Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DXJerky-Version 2.5
Didn't HBK win the Rumble as a #1 entrant?
All this talk of "casual" fan is BS. The "casual fan" doesn't even know about the history of the World Championship (from the NWA-WCW-WWE), whereas they would know the history (or more likely to know) of the WWF/E World Heavyweight Championship because of guys like Hogan, Bret Hart, UT, Austin, Rock, etc. The belts should have never been separated after it was an undisputed championship.
Lesnar shouldn't job to Goldberg, it would just make the SD! brand look more weak.
|
I wasn't talking about the histories of the two titles at all. I was saying that at this present moment right now, which title do you think the casual fan considers more important? I know a lot of people who watch wrestling but don't go on the internet or anything and almost all of them think Raw is the superior show and Raw's Title is the superior title. Forget about them knowing the histories of the title. I myself don't see a difference in the titles, but, and I could be wrong, I tend to think that the WWE puts the Raw show in front of Smackdown. I remember reading a post the other day on here on how all the returning or new superstars like Goldberg, Rock, Foley, Austin all go to Raw and not Smackdown. It just seems like Raw has all the wrestlers that the casual fan would consider "Superstars" Meanwhile smackdown gets people like The Cat.