|
Yeah this is a tough question, but its got an obvious answer IMO.
As has been said, its hard to pass up on Foley-Taker. It wasn't as good int he ring as some of the other matches, but the bumps and Foley continuing so long after the bumps, makes it likely the most memorable match in WWE history.
HBK-Taker was probably the overall best "match" but it doesn't hold the same place in history as Foley-Taker.
I also really liked the 6-way.
Lesnar-Taker is underrated. They managed to have a great match without going out of the cage. In a way going out of the cage is kinda like 'cheating' because the whole point of the match should be to keep the guys locked inside. I think Taker-Lesnar was the first one not to go outside and Taker did a great job making Lesnar look like a monster.
I haven't seen Batista-HHH yet, so I can judge that one yet.
I also agree that HIAC needs some new twist to make it interesting again. The Elimination Chamber is a more 'dangerous' structure, which makes HIAC look weaker. The one thing HIAC always had was the chance of a big bump. But as we all know, its downright stupid to risk major talent by having them take huge bumps.
|