Thread: DISCUSSION - Should the WWE (temporarily) re-unite the rosters before WRESTLEMANIA?
View Single Post
Old 01-27-2004, 08:21 PM   #5
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BasicThuganomics
NO!!!!! THE ROSTERS AREN'T GOING TO BE REUINITED FOR THE HUNDRETH ****ING TIME!!!!!!!! DAMNIT, THINK UP OTHER IDEAS BESIDES "REUNITING ROSTERS"


Damnit, like once a month you post a thread about reuniting the ****ing rosters!!!! It's no happening anytime soon, so just GET OVER IT!!!!!
Temporarily.

Think about it.

At this rate, you MIGHT have Benoit, Goldberg, and Kane or Taker switching rosters to start their respective feuds.

two things:

1) If all of these 'roster switches' are to take place, then don't you think it will wreck the magic of roster trades?

2) If no rosters switches take place, would it really make sense for guys like Lesnar/Goldberg, Kane/Taker, and Triple H/Benoit to be feuding with one another while NOT being on the same show?
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote