Thread: WWE going back to the future?
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2005, 12:43 PM   #20
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
Actually, if you take the title of this thread in context with how it was originally used (the movie), then Bahena is technically correct.

Marty went back in time, and was trying to get BACK to the FUTURE, or BACK to the present, from the past.

The WWE has not gone back in time and are not facing a struggle to return to the present. Although that would be a very interesting storyline, with all the superstars dressing up like wrestlers from the 80's, and Paul Heyman playing "the Doc."
Back to the Future was mereely a tagline which was needlessly confusing, but catchy for the purpose of naming a movie. IT was a Spielberg Zemeckis project, and hardly bleeding edge Sci Fi...A lot of that shit made NO sense, so arguing that, from the standpoint of the movie, this title makes sense and is valid is kind of pointless.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote