Thread: Lesnar's Had the Title for quite a while
View Single Post
Old 01-29-2004, 06:06 PM   #9
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Head
I dunno, I'm not really sure if I feel that shorter title reigns make the belt look weaker. I think it could just make the competition for the belt look harder. Granted, I'm not talking about week long title reigns, but 1-2 month reigns.

Not that I really would enjoy having the WWE Title being the Superbowl of wrestling, but more frequent changes definatly does make the belt look stronger IMO, it's just bad for building up individual wrestlers.
The belt has no inherrent strength to itself. The only strength is in the competition. If the title scene is weak, the title appears weak.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote