Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vampiro03
I asked a question, thats all and everybody jumped on me for it. the things I said in my question were true and accurate. I just don't understand I personally liked brock and goldberg. after wm xx we all knew neither man could call a match. I didn't want to go to war over it.
|
I wasn't trying to jump on your case. But I don't think it was a valid comparison. Or, at least, it was overly-simplified. If you were trying to compare Goldberg to Brock in order to defend Goldberg, then you're mistaken. First, like I said, Goldberg actually had much better, much smarter reasons for leaving the WWE, while Brock was being a jack-ass.
But Brock is better in the ring. He is. I don't think this is even a discussion. I don't care if you say "Well, he was carried," Brock Lesnar was in an Iron Man match with Kurt Angle. He had strong matches with both members of the WGTT. His matches with John Cena were so underrated, they're probably over-rated by now. And his matches with Big Show were watchable. And its the Big Show. Basically, in his shotened run on SD, he put on more quality matches than Godberg has in his entire career.
I don't like Bill as a person or in the ring; that being said I do know that he's the one guy that is enough of a draw to legitimize an upstart promotion. And he's gone out of his way to try to mend fences with people he used to have heat with.
Basically, if you're trying to say that anyone who wants Lesnar back should want GB back, then you're mistaken. Two different cases. Lesnar is an asshole who puts on decent matches who will still probably act like an asshole. Whereas Bill was an asshole who put on lousy matches but is a huge draw and seems to have mellowed out in his old age.