Thread: Do you think the commentry would be better if they didn't know what was going on?
View Single Post
Old 08-07-2005, 04:46 PM   #2
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Which bump are you talking about? If they didn't know that Mick was coming off the cage to the announce table they could have been killed. There was no way in insuring that Mick was going to hit the Spanish table.

As for the idea, I read in the Death of WCW that the announcers didn't know what was happening some of the time, and thus produced some crappy commentary.

Instead of pulling off spur of the moment stuff, they would probably be more confused than anything.
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote