Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
That paragraph is way confusing. You are jumbling thoughts together like mad.
I know the cone is for accuracy. I have had little problem using it on offense. But with defense, someone like Farve will be accurate to almost everyone since his vision covers the field. I'm not a great defense caller, and I don't think a football game can be played by just guarding the person closest to you. You have to guard everyone. All the games I've played have been against crappier QBs, and the cone has made it much easier for me to guess where they are going. That's why I got so many user picks. I was just commenting that I don't think it will be as simple playing against teams with veteran QBs.
On scrambling, I've gotten used to it. But then again, I use Vick. Case closed.
|
I'm not jumbling anything together. If you don't understand, that's your problem.
See, what you are doing is trying to read a QB's eyes. Like in the NFL, if you do that, you will get burned by one who knows how to exploit you.
The way I play cone vision, is to stare down one WR and force the safety or a linebacker in a zone to roll over that way, then QUICKLY look away and throw it elsewhere. If you can see everyone, nobody will ever roll coverage. They will stay honest. This will 1) Create more 1-on-1 coverage, which is better for the QB, but it will also 2) Keep everyone covered, so that nobody cheats on a receiver they think is outside of the field of vision. If you try to user pick, the QB pump fakes to the WR in his cone, then throws it to his TE who you have left wide open, then you will be in trouble.
The cone is for accuracy. If you know how to use it, then it doesn't matter how big your cone is, and sometimes having a smaller cone is better.
Does that make any sense yet? If not, read it again.