Thread: So Softer Wrestling has really made pro wrestlers safer, eh?
View Single Post
Old 08-15-2005, 03:35 PM   #4
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gooch
What I find amusing is that they preach safety for some and let others who seem to have more pull politically pull out the odd slam on steel steps and Tombstone piledriver.

Perhaps the risky moves should be reserved for PPVs, but both Smackdown and RAW could really use a breakout star and many of them who do have potential need to be able to use high-risk shit to get over.
Yeah, I've noticed. Piledrivers are bad, unless you're the Undertaker, who's getting sloppy and is probably more dangerous than most.

Now, I don't think we need a bunch of huge "HOLY SHIT" Spots on TV, it's more the way they pussified the Walls of Jericho, or got rid of the Vertebreaker, banning move after move. I mean, honestly, even the finishers are generic these days in most cases. Very few finishers are truly unique within the WWE, because the moves are so limited that we're down to chokeslams, superkicks, and submission moves.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote