Thread: TNA isn't *that* bad.
View Single Post
Old 08-20-2005, 01:26 AM   #10
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
TNA isn't THAT bad, but it's not THAT good, either. I swear, it still feels like WCW.

TNA was improving even before they went of FSN. Doesn't make 'em a good show, and to draw me in, they're gonna need more. Believe it or not, I watch the WWE because I've already been watching it for a while. I'm not sure I'd be watching them right now if I had to start watching blank slate. The habit's formed, I know and c are about it, and so on.

TNA's no better off. No habit, not a signifcant draw on my interest, and the ups haven't been enough to turn that around...Yet. They could blow me away sometime soon, but there needs to be enough going on to make me give a shit.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote