Thread: More and more I think they should just reunite the rosters...
View Single Post
Old 08-29-2005, 01:56 AM   #24
Londoner
One Of A Kind
 
Londoner's Avatar
 
Posts: 22,178
Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)Londoner puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
If they had the roster to support two unique shows, and the writing talent to keep up interestin storylines nonstop, I'd be all for it.

The problem is, I think between the two shows, you get one GREAT show every week. And let's face it, the continuity on that would suck (If you just chopped outthe bad and spliced the good). IT entertains em, but I KNOW it could entertain me more.

What worries me is that if they do have only one show or one "brand," The creative team will then just go and put in half the effort. That they won't take advantage of a stronger roster, and we'll end up with no undercard/little midcard and no tag team division...Just like now.
I don't see how it can be worse than it currently is at the moment though, they only put in 'half the effort' for two shows right now, if anything I reckon they would be more motivated to write better shows if we just had Raw, not only would it involve less writing, but a packed roster.It would also mean we wouldn't have to see Val Venis jobbing on Raw every week, he can do that on heat for all i care.
Londoner is offline   Reply With Quote