View Single Post
Old 08-29-2005, 07:21 AM   #37
KayfabeMan
TPWW's Glass Ceiling
 
KayfabeMan's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,793
KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)KayfabeMan puts the "bang" in Bangladesh (30,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TL
What's the big deal about having rights to a name? We all know who they're, so what are the WWE doing other than punishing the Dudley Boyz for leaving the WWE?(Can't remember if they were fired or quit)
Granted, it would be worse if they had a real gimmick, gimmick [say it were Shark Boy or The Undertaker], but they still won't have their names. For all the indy promoters who use them, it's no big deal - because they can still advertise them as The Dudleys, or "formerly known as" The Dudleys, etc. - but for any major groups, they now only have face value, not name value.

I don't think it has any major impact on anyone in particular, but I'm sure after working with one name for so many years, one would like to keep it.
KayfabeMan is offline   Reply With Quote