Thread: Why is Kurt Angle good?
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2005, 04:30 PM   #36
Vastardikai
Taller than Adam Cole
 
Vastardikai's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,876
Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Vastardikai makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuzziebro619
What is the point of even asking why Angle is good?
Against my better judgement, I'll answer this question.

Why should people ask why ANYONE is good?

Seriously, I think it can help explain why some people like someone and why others aren't.

First Steve Austin match I saw, I think it was against Sam Houston in WCW, first words coming out of my mouth were, and I quote "This guy's a good wrestler." I wasn't talking about Houston, btw. He had the ability and he had the "IT" factor.

Strange, how some of the better technical wrestlers of the 15 years I've watched regularly are the ones with either an amateur background (Angle, Shelton, Flair, Tazz), or were trained by some of the legit badasses back in the day, such as Killer Kowalski or Stu Hart (Triple H, Saturn, Benoit, Jericho).

Yes, Flair and Tazz both had amateur backgrounds.
Vastardikai is offline   Reply With Quote