Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vastardikai
Against my better judgement, I'll answer this question.
Why should people ask why ANYONE is good?
Seriously, I think it can help explain why some people like someone and why others aren't.
First Steve Austin match I saw, I think it was against Sam Houston in WCW, first words coming out of my mouth were, and I quote "This guy's a good wrestler." I wasn't talking about Houston, btw. He had the ability and he had the "IT" factor.
Strange, how some of the better technical wrestlers of the 15 years I've watched regularly are the ones with either an amateur background (Angle, Shelton, Flair, Tazz), or were trained by some of the legit badasses back in the day, such as Killer Kowalski or Stu Hart (Triple H, Saturn, Benoit, Jericho).
Yes, Flair and Tazz both had amateur backgrounds.
|
Yes I agree. but why would someone question a superstars in-ring ability (and for Angle his ability outside the ring as well).
OKay its not always about how well they can perform in a match, sometimes you like a guy because hes good on the mic or whatever, but that doesnt make him GOOD.
What makes a wrestler good is the fact that they go out everyday and put on an awesome show for us. They put their body on the line more than once, they have an injury but still come out at a PPV, whether you 'mark out' when he does something insane, and whether they stay true to us, the fans. (Thats why no-one likes the WWE Creative Team)
