Thread: Did Bret Hart do anything important other than The Montreal Screwjob?
View Single Post
Old 05-15-2018, 04:30 PM   #156
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dastardly One View Post
Oh fuck off Gert lol

This has been explained ad nauseam a million times. First of all, Michaels was a prick to Bret. Told him he'd never job to him. I've heard tons of wrestlers say they'd never have jobbed to Michaels under the same circumstances.

He said he'd have jobbed out any other time after Montreal to Shawn (he was still under contract). He'd have jobbed to anyone BEFORE Montreal other than Shawn. I'm not blaming Vince for doing what he did but let's not act like Bret was the only guilty party.

But whatever, keep servicing your retarded narrative.
You're rationalizing. "He was a dick to me" isn't a reason to refuse to drop the title to the guy they wanna push. He was on his way out and they wanted HBK to get the rub off of him on his way out. He should have dropped the title to a broom if they wanted him to instead of being a mark for himself and refusing to lose a fake title to a guy because he was mean to him. End of story.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote