View Single Post
Old 09-13-2018, 03:20 PM   #45093
GD
 
Posts: 58,594
GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)GD makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
So apparently The Bellas are on both shows. Is there an explanation for that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Nope.

At least when Cena did it, WWE gave an excuse for why he could swap brands even though it didn't make sense once you actually thought about it.
After a quick search on the Superstars page of WWE.com, it seems like Nikki Bella is still advertised as a Smackdown competitor whereas Brie Bella isn't associated with either brands, which means that she's a "free agent". That being said, John Cena is listed as a RAW competitor, although he's advertised as a "free agent". The amount of inconsistency in the company is baffling considering how anal they're about production.
GD is offline   Reply With Quote