View Single Post
Old 05-17-2018, 11:19 AM   #203
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
I have no clue what you're trying to say here. I mean, I get that you think that Punk was overall better, but I'm saying that I don't think he was. So...okay?

Also, I'm sure the time will come where I will take Reigns over Punk too. I don't really miss Punk at all.
Will you take Reigns over Bret? I was saying your use of "Wembley vs Punk's one buyrate" to determine who was better is flawed.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote