Thread: NFL Thread
View Single Post
Old 09-02-2014, 02:56 PM   #771
DrA
 
Posts: 24,512
DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DrA makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrA View Post
You know what, I agree, no argument from me. I don't think that's going to happen with Seattle.
Actually I don't agree because Wilson doesn't have to get injured for what I'm saying to apply. Atlanta last year might be a better example because Matt Ryan played all 16 games even though they went 4-12 and literally everyone picked them to be good (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap200...l-reign-in-nfc). And it isn't a ridiculous argument to make because it happens to at least one top team in the NFL every year, teams that seem to have the depth and the inability to be bad, but they start with a couple of early losses, have the wrong injuries at the wrong time and just never get their act together. I think it's more likely to happen to a team like Denver or San Francisco, but I don't think it's inconceivable to think that it could happen to Seattle, they've been good for two seasons but I don't that's enough to determine whether they're capable of having a down year.
DrA is offline