|
your presumption is full of a thousand holes.
firstly you assume he wasnt paid enough to not live in trailer park. you rule out the fact he could be terrible with money. his end result in no way reflects his income.
conversely you rule out that he may be great with money. a guy living on the road 250+ days a year buying a house may not he the best use of his income. why buy somethin so expensive that you never use? the same is true for vehicles. you're going to be using rentals 90% of the time. having some nice truck sitting at a house you never go to may just not be how he choses to spend his money.
and most importantly you ignore the most pressing issue: whippleman has been with the company for decades working for a wage he agreed to. he's not entitled to anything more than that.
you default your assumptions to some imaginary slight thats been made against him based off your preconceptions that are void of any tangible truth. this issue exists in your head. you are raging against a boogyman of your own making.
|