Thread: Does the WWE have an agenda when it comes to who they elect as a HoF'er ?
View Single Post
Old 07-13-2018, 08:59 PM   #25
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
If Marty Jannetty wasn't such a mess, he'd be in. I don't see them putting Shawn Michaels in with him again, because The Rockers was such a preliminary stage of Shawn Michaels' career. The Horsemen were built around main event Flair. Shawn Michaels would induct him.

Demolition would have gone in years ago if they weren't part of the lawsuit against WWE. Of the people who sued WWE, I think they might be the ones Triple H works hardest at repairing the relationship with. I can see them being bonus characters in a video game within a few years time. The New Day will probably induct them.

Personal reasons leave out others and they only like one posthumous entry per year. Plus they also like box-ticking with their entries. It's why they will induct D'Lo Brown and Torrie Wilson within a few years.

Yes, they absolutely do have an agenda.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote