Thread: All Elite Wrestling
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2020, 04:54 PM   #3484
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Television ratings are compared however the person making the comparison wants to compare them. You and xrod seem to think Nielsen has sent down this edict that two shows airing 5 days apart are not allowed to be compared because of an imaginary brick wall separating weeks. It’s fucking bizarre.
Remember all those times Nitro was compared to Raw from the previous week? No imaginary brick wall between those 7 days.

Come on, man, you can’t seriously believe this. Over the weekend, especially at this time of year, things change. People use their weeks to order time. That’s literally what a week is. Comparing a nothing Raw less than two weeks out from Christmas that went against a giant football game with a highly promoted super-show from the previous week is sneaky and dishonest. You wouldn’t compare an episode of Seinfeld from 1997 with an episode of Home Improvement from the previous week. You’d look at the two within the same week, because factors from the week could affect the programming success.

Besides, what did AEW even win? It didn’t win in viewership. It didn’t win in the 18-49 demo. It won something like 18-34 and that gets emphasized by people on a payroll and it becomes “AEW beat Raw” when it’s removed from its context, and that is just no accurate. It’s important to stick to the facts at least some of the time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emperor Smeat View Post
Its Vince McMahon style Confirmation Bias mentality from the both of them.

If something happens that doesn't fit their narrow view, it must be wrong no matter if evidence points the other way.

If something happens that ends up fitting their narrow view, they were always right and everyone else was always wrong. Doesn't matter if they were wrong before, they just need to be right once to make the claim. Also doesn't matter how it has to be twisted in order to be right on their end.
You are a parrot who copies and pastes his opinions from the dirt sheets. Whenever you are challenged on them you keep falling back to the same mimicked talking points no matter how obviously fraudulent they are. When called out about it you cry about how it isn’t fair poor you is being picked on. And you have the audacity to call anyone else narrow-minded?

Reporting that AEW beat Raw backwards through time is confirmation bias. Last week AEW didn’t beat Raw. It was 1.5 million viewers to 800k viewers, or something like that. How fucking dare you go on about someone else’s confirmation bias lol.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote