OMFG again.
They've both brought up stuff from AEW and other non-RAW shows in context of RAW ratings before when something notable happened for recent shows comparisons. This wasn't something out of the blue. What made last week talk any special was solely because a most recent AEW show managed to actually top a most recent RAW show for the first time ever.
Observer's report on the ratings had the headline of "WWE Raw ratings hit new all-time record low" and just one small paragraph talking about what AEW's most recent show did for comparisons since something notable happened between the two shows.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Observer
For the first time ever, not only did last week's AEW Dynamite beat an hour of Raw, but it beat all three hours in 18-49 and 18-34. It is not a lock AEW will beat Raw's numbers tomorrow but it would be a surprise if it doesn't beat this Friday's SmackDown numbers on FS1. AEW has only beaten 0.41 twice this year, both times in the last two weeks.
|
You and Noid somehow think they've been on this high and mighty boasting crusade when that wasn't the case at all. Alvarez barely gloated about what happened anyways and the brief time he did was also in context of why this should be a huge wake up call to RAW that serious changes need to be made to the whole creative process of the show. He even gives reasons why RAW's been in a such a poor state for as long as its been and why that should not be the case considering the quality of talent on their roster each year.
I also still don't get why you and Noid are so hung up over anyone comparing stuff that doesn't strictly fit your view of a week. Even you keep bragging on Tuesdays how RAW beats AEW in viewership despite the two shows not being from the same week so don't go try telling me that I'm the one cherry picking stuff.