Thread: NFL Thread
View Single Post
Old 01-11-2015, 05:15 PM   #3087
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
No, it's an awful rule. It's always been an awful rule. Mike Pereira, while discussing why it was the right call after the game even acknowledged it's a bad rule. If the guy catches the football, gets his feet down and "makes a football move", the question of whether it's a catch or not should be over. If he loses the ball after that should be a fumble. It shouldn't retroactively take the catch away. It's retarded.
#1-norm-fan is offline