View Single Post
Old 10-16-2017, 08:15 AM   #37243
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,508
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Goddammit, this isn't that deep. But I'll explain it since you're missing my point.

I am aware that other people are talking about Jimmy Jacobs getting credit or taking credit for a segment.

You praised Jericho by saying segments he is in shine because he is great.

You then said that despite a segment he was in shining, it looked average on paper.

I asked, in direct response to that specific point, why it matters how a segment looks on paper if it works on TV.

I did not mention any specific segments or Jimmy Jacobs, though again, I understand that others were discussing those things.

My question is a direct response to your point about a segment working on TV but looking average on paper.

I don't think how a segment looks beforehand is relevant when it is well-received on TV. That is what I am asking you to clarify.

I'm not sure how much clearer you need me to be.
screech is offline   Reply With Quote