View Single Post
Old 03-24-2018, 10:21 PM   #80
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
TNA, by and large, has been worse. WCW was actually something. When it went off the rails, it really went off the rails, but it is revisionist history and the WWE does dumb shit like they are doing now. Like, they wouldn't be getting away with their stale product if there was competition. And people like to laugh at WCW pushing old guys, but look at that Survivor Series main event. We're about to enter a PPV where the legitimate choices to headline are a repeat of a match that didn't achieve what it was supposed to three years ago; a mixed tag featuring two old guys, a non-wrestler and a green girl; and a match between an old guy and a dude with one foot out the door four or so years later than it should have been.

Honestly, modern WWE might be worse than WCW, and TNA is only worse because it exists in this other universe where you can't really take it seriously in retrospect.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote