Thread: If you could go back in time and change the events in one match, what would you change?
View Single Post
Old 05-26-2019, 07:49 PM   #41
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simple Fan View Post
I'd change Sting vs Hogan at Starrcade 97 to a cage match and have Sting go over without the shenanigans.
I thought about some WCW ones, but the thing with WCW is that they were always going to make bone-headed decisions just because of the philosophy and mentality of people there. You can change one finish, then you're going to get politics fucking up something a month later.

In a perfect world, Hogan would have been willing to play ball and maybe build to something with Bret. But it isn't and he wasn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iceman King Gertner View Post
I wouldn't put that on Austin. Business was trending down prior to the turn. You could argue his heel work in 2001 was his best character work. I much prefer 2001 Austin over 98-2000 Stone Cold.
I don't blame Austin's performances or anything. There was an air around the product, you're right, and it didn't help that they were losing all their babyfaces. They probably should have had a tiny bit more foresight and had people built up to go against a heel Austin should they have wanted to go down that route.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote