Thread: Sasha Banks and Naomi indefinitely suspended by WWE
View Single Post
Old 05-22-2022, 02:23 AM   #129
xrodmuc316
RoBOT Reigns
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,619
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senpai Seph View Post
and I have the opposite reaction to that than erickman does, I think them pulling merch further leans into this being a work. They don't pull anyones merch for anything ever, no matter how bad it is, and they've had worse fallings out than this before. They want people thinking this is a huge deal. Why? To what end?
Same, WWE is just not going to eat the costs of their merch.

There was a story going around that when they fired Enzo, they had a boatload of new G shirts made, and they gave Chad Gable the Shorty G gimmick solely so they could repurpose those shirts and still sell them.

If they are willing to do that, it shows how much they do not want to have sunk costs.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote