View Single Post
Old 01-24-2018, 08:20 AM   #208
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,428
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Here's the thing Noid. I was obviously being hyperbolic, you clearly don't see EVERY WOMAN AS DAMSELS IN DISTRESS. I was busting your balls.

But the problem is, everyone is free to have their own stance and perspective on these issues so long as they are not hindering an investigation or inflicting the action upon someone.

We live in a society where a "are you sure she's not lying" means you are a ghastly individual.

Us going, "trainwreck girl with history of drug use, erratic behaviour, and lying, who goes onto Twitter and TMZ to sensationalize her rape case lacks some credibility...though she could still be telling the truth" is not the same as some fuckwit judge asking the plaintiff in a rape case why she "didn't just keep her legs closed".

It's also not the same as judges who let the likes of Brock Turner (and another Canadian athlete) off easy because they're "good kids".

These two issues may have to do with the same subject matter, but they're both different.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote