Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2019, 10:57 PM   #769
BigCrippyZ
 
BigCrippyZ's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,033
BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)BigCrippyZ got the bus to Rep Town and repped it up real bad at the rep shop (100,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Destor View Post
Also neilson data is public you dont have to pay to get it. You pay to have the study done.


Wow.

Um... ad agencies and cable and broadcast networks literally pay an annual data licensing fee (that's literally the defined term and usually the 3rd or 4th heading in their contracts) to get way more data and analytics than are released to the public. It's a part of every Nielsen agreement, both the purchasing analytics and the viewing analytics contracts, and is typically based on the size of the customer. It's their core business model and product.

Also, the data licensing fees (and thus Nielsen's revenues) have been dropping because Nielsen's competitors (especially among broadcasters) have been offering apparently "more accurate" data at less cost.
BigCrippyZ is offline   Reply With Quote