"Well, let me get this straight, Silk, you pint of SOY milk....So you wanna compare the King of Mexico North, Bret Hart, that Canadian sunava bitc against Michael Hayes?
Well, let's do some math.
You see, when facing a real man, a genetic freak like Big Poppa Pump, Bret Hart has a zero percent chance winning cause he didn't even try, so you take that zero percent chance winnin and divide it in half because any Canadian is half the man anybody else is and you get half of a zero percent points, chances for the King of Mexico North!
But then you look on the other side and look at Michael Hayes, now Michael Hayes is an American, so you don't divide his percent chance in half but multiply it by 2, so you get 0 by 2, but then you gonna say, well he beat Big Poppa Pump in 1989, so he gets another 100% chance for winning, but that sissy boy only won by CHEATING when he beat Big Poppa Pump so that means, you take his percents and turn them negative! So Michael Hayes gonna start with NEGATIVE 100% chance chances of winnin!
So if we look at our results, we see that Bret Hart has 0.5% points while Hayes has -100% percent chance of winning and one half is more than negative one hundred, so the king of Mexico North steals another win, but if you put either one of them against the Big Bad Booty Daddy you know who's gonna be the one coming home crying to mama and seeing her getting a taste of the peaks!
Holla if you heard me.
This has been a 100% scientific analysis of Michael Hayes vs Bret Hart using Steiner's patentended mathematical analysis model.