View Single Post
Old 12-21-2020, 01:30 AM   #3503
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
No, it wouldn’t be the same story if NXT achieved something. It would be that AEW did really well with grey-haired women and they’re now a key demo magically. This is all about making AEW look as good as possible, which is why a shit Raw from one week was compared to a great AEW from another week instead of the shit AEW from the same week.

And that people won’t admit that is really frustrating. We haven’t heard any special news stories about Dynamite losing 200k viewers. Why? Because no one wants to tell the truth about the situation.

Raw beat Dynamite last week. It was a shitty week for both. The week prior was a bigger week for Dynamite off Sting that they managed to do a better rating in a particular demo than Raw got the following week (all-time low) but Dynamite also dropped.

If Raw got a 4.5 against Nitro’s 4.7, but then the next week Nitro got a 4.4, the story isn’t that Raw beat Nitro because a 4.5 is bigger. Especially when it comes back that Raw got a 4.3 and Nitro actually won.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote