pepsi man on ps1 rules, sweet soundtrack
xrod, if punk gave his blessing to do a corporate sponsorship, but he only agreed to do so if he could be
pepsi man, would you approve? would this type of contract stipulation be a compromising of values, even given the
cool-factor (plus the fact that dude already has the ink?) i would say the whole point of the tattoo was irony, no? take from the rich, give to the lessers, eh? what about a charity clause for his earnings, mmm?
also, would he ever be able to escape "PEPSI MAN!" chants going forward? would he have to start doing the pepsi plunge more often? would fan-demand force his hand in having to sign a deal to accommodate a distribution of joint-branded merch that would inevitably be posted in the
terrible merch thread, and at some point, he'd take a personal cut?
lastly, who actually gives a shit? you post more about punk than the #1 roman reigns and shield fan in the world posts about the three pillows of justuss on twitter
man, i hope you read all of that. one luv, b