View Single Post
Old 06-10-2021, 03:40 PM   #27
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fundiddle View Post
the tired "wrestling has been cringe for a while now, see example A from 20/30 years ago" argument doesn't work when there's considerably less actual wrestling
It has been on the decline since 2001. Then you go back and you see content from then and think “this isn’t that bad.” The same with 2002. I’m watching some in-ring stuff from 2003 and it is amazing compared to today. But it was still losing fans. It’s a perfectly cogent argument.

There’s probably more in-ring stuff now than then. It feels like a lot of matches go longer than they need to, especially with Raw being 3 hours.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote