|
Damn that Cornette for wanting logic in his wrestling. Grrr. Doesn't he know it's supposed to feature children and people the size of children?
The brand split is dumb. If you want to focus on different people on different shows, you can do that without boxing yourself in and having 4 unnecessary championships. Philosophically, having multiple champions for one things makes no sense -- being the only one is what being the champion is supposed to mean.
There should be a singles belt, tag belts and a women's belt. If you want to keep going with the bullshit cruiserweight thing, they can have a belt, I suppose -- but I just don't get that experiment. If you want to do six-man tag belts and a women's tag belt or whatever -- cool. At least they mean different things.
When everybody is a champion, what does being a champion mean? What does it actually add to a guy? Who was the last guy to even get over by winning the "World Title?" It doesn't make anyone anymore because it's an arbitrary role people fill on rotation.
|