View Single Post
Old 05-02-2019, 09:21 AM   #11
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,427
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Why would anyone commit to regularly watching RAW? Even if it was 100% better than it was, 3 hours per show is torture. If RAW were an hour, I'd probably watch every week because even if it sucked, it'd be 45 minutes of actual material. In fact, they wouldn't have the time to suck as bad as they do. Watch 1995 RAW AKA the dark period, and you'll see how much better it is than now literally because you only have to commit an hour.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote