TPWW Forums
View Poll Results: Should The Streak end?
Yes, but not this year
22
28.57%
Yes and I want Triple H to do it
3
3.90%
No, never
52
67.53%
Voters: 77. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.
1 2
wrestling forum>The Streak
XCaliber 12:35 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by J Dogg Funk:
Like it or not The Miz is the next huge Star on WWE. A Miz win over Undertaker at WM 28 (next year) will truly put him over the top.
I personally love watching the Miz and think he has really elevated his game to a new level heading into WM 27.
That is so not gonna happen as he doesn't have the resume at this point to book him to be a legitamite threat to end it but having him beat Cena at WM27 would be a nice start but that ain't gonna happen I'm afraid.Like it or not The Miz is the next huge Star on WWE. A Miz win over Undertaker at WM 28 (next year) will truly put him over the top.
I personally love watching the Miz and think he has really elevated his game to a new level heading into WM 27.
ooTin 12:58 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by Droford:
Barrett is a tool and an inadequate wrestler. He will not end the underTakers streak. PERIOD.
Stickman 01:03 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by seapig4:
Why are they not mentioning that triple h has already lost to taker at wm?
This, it's been bugging me throughout the whole feud.Why are they not mentioning that triple h has already lost to taker at wm?
Tom Guycott 01:15 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by seapig4:
Why are they not mentioning that triple h has already lost to taker at wm?
Like Jericho's title win, "it didn't happen". Admitting that it happened would weaken the credibility of the possibility of it happening. And we all know that WWE doesn't want HHH "looking weak"*. Psychologically, it's a bit of a different bear of back to back 'Taker vs Michaels.Why are they not mentioning that triple h has already lost to taker at wm?
Plus, it seems to fall under the 7 year rule, so theoretically, nobody remembers that except the internet.
*That was a swipe at the video game advertisement policy for their top stars. Bad joke, I know.
Grablot 01:33 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by Tom Guycott:
Like Jericho's title win, "it didn't happen". Admitting that it happened would weaken the credibility of the possibility of it happening. And we all know that WWE doesn't want HHH "looking weak"*. Psychologically, it's a bit of a different bear of back to back 'Taker vs Michaels.
Plus, it seems to fall under the 7 year rule, so theoretically, nobody remembers that except the internet.
*That was a swipe at the video game advertisement policy for their top stars. Bad joke, I know.
That dont make no sense. Would it be better to say HHH lost to Taker before but he isnt gonna let himself do it again. All these years hes been thinking of how he can beat Taker at mania and get his revenge and now he thinks he has come up with a way to do it. It would be IMO better to mention it. Like Jericho's title win, "it didn't happen". Admitting that it happened would weaken the credibility of the possibility of it happening. And we all know that WWE doesn't want HHH "looking weak"*. Psychologically, it's a bit of a different bear of back to back 'Taker vs Michaels.
Plus, it seems to fall under the 7 year rule, so theoretically, nobody remembers that except the internet.
*That was a swipe at the video game advertisement policy for their top stars. Bad joke, I know.
#1-norm-fan 03:36 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by Grablot:
That dont make no sense. Would it be better to say HHH lost to Taker before but he isnt gonna let himself do it again. All these years hes been thinking of how he can beat Taker at mania and get his revenge and now he thinks he has come up with a way to do it. It would be IMO better to mention it.
It would be better. I feel like the only reason they aren't doing it is because it really makes Triple H look inferior to showcase that at his prime and still now, he just can't beat Taker under pressure and then prove that fact right by having him lose.That dont make no sense. Would it be better to say HHH lost to Taker before but he isnt gonna let himself do it again. All these years hes been thinking of how he can beat Taker at mania and get his revenge and now he thinks he has come up with a way to do it. It would be IMO better to mention it.
Of course, this is assuming he's going to lose again. Which I will do. Because he is going to.
Attitude99 04:13 PM 03-27-2011
Will Not Happen you bitches
James Steele 04:32 PM 03-27-2011
I am almost positive we will get Cena/Undertaker next year (but we have all thought that for a few years now). WWE would be foolish not to get it in while Undertaker can still deliver a match that can live up to that kind of hype plus with it being for the unbelievable 20-0 record in a massive outdoor stadium...
jskinnyg 05:43 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by James Steele:
I am almost positive we will get Cena/Undertaker next year (but we have all thought that for a few years now). WWE would be foolish not to get it in while Undertaker can still deliver a match that can live up to that kind of hype plus with it being for the unbelievable 20-0 record in a massive outdoor stadium...
Yup... Hate it, but if Taker is healthy this time next year... That will be his retirement match Steel-O...I am almost positive we will get Cena/Undertaker next year (but we have all thought that for a few years now). WWE would be foolish not to get it in while Undertaker can still deliver a match that can live up to that kind of hype plus with it being for the unbelievable 20-0 record in a massive outdoor stadium...
Jordan 06:05 PM 03-27-2011
I am starting to feel like Triple H would be better to end The Streak than Cena, and this being a huge Wrestlemania, one of the biggest ever I could easily accept this being the end of The Undertaker.
James Steele 07:03 PM 03-27-2011
If Triple H beats The Undertaker at WrestleMania XXVII, then I will never mention Triple H again on TPWW except for one last Blowout Triple H Appreciation Thread.
Grablot 08:59 PM 03-27-2011
The only reason for HHH not to end the streak is because it would be cool for Taker to retire at Mania 30 but with Taker being mad old u never know when he will have to retire so u might as well do it now when u got someone like HHH to end it.
DLVH84 09:22 PM 03-27-2011
Triple H had his chance 10 years ago and he failed.
James Steele 09:25 PM 03-27-2011
Originally Posted by DLVH84:
Triple H had his chance 10 years ago and he failed.
Triple H had his chance 10 years ago and he failed.
Jordan 09:51 PM 03-27-2011
The fact that Triple H lost the last round give cause he could win this time just as much as it does for The Undertaker.
MoFo 10:23 PM 03-27-2011
I would like Triple H to end it at Mania, if only for the huge shock.
Nobody expects it, and we need more moments like that in wrasslin'
Nobody expects it, and we need more moments like that in wrasslin'
James Steele 10:28 PM 03-27-2011
Y'all are scaring me now...I am dead serious. Triple H beats Undertaker at WrestleMania XXVII and I will never mention him on TPWW again after a celebratory thread.
Rock Bottom 12:58 PM 03-28-2011
Don't think it'll end. Makes no sense to at this point. At best I see his last match being one after Wrestlemania on the following PPV where the guy who couldn't beat him at Mania goes over.
I don't think they can tarnish his streak with anything but a clean win either, so that puts out most heels. Very rarely do you see heels go clean.
I don't think they can tarnish his streak with anything but a clean win either, so that puts out most heels. Very rarely do you see heels go clean.
M-A-G 01:08 PM 03-28-2011
The best time to end it would've been when Orton was up against him during his whole 'Legend Killer' bit but even then it would've only been cool if Undertaker was calling it quits. I think now it's just beyond the point where it can ended in a reasonable manner.
seapig4 01:45 PM 03-28-2011
If its Taker vs Cena next year, I hope they use the occasion to turn Cena heel
DLVH84 12:09 PM 03-29-2011
Originally Posted by seapig4:
If its Taker vs Cena next year, I hope they use the occasion to turn Cena heel
That would definitely be the idea.If its Taker vs Cena next year, I hope they use the occasion to turn Cena heel
Rock Bottom 09:39 PM 03-29-2011
Don't think they need that moment to turn Cena heel. Keep him feuding with Rock and that will forcably happen. Be the same thing if Austin came back. Although I wish Rock would talk a little less. Guy can make the crowd go berserk with random gestures. Pretty sure people are going to cheer when rock bottom costs Cena his WM title shot.
Jordan 11:16 AM 03-30-2011
I think this match needs to be the main event btw... The Undertaker's legacy is very important and more than likely he will be regarded as the best ever, he's defiantly on track. I can't think of another wrestler has had as many important matches other than maybe Hulk Hogan.
1 2