Default Style Register
TPWW Forums
View Poll Results: Did Bret Hart do anything important other than The Montreal Screwjob?
Nope, Montreal is it 4 10.81%
yeah 26 70.27%
Goldberg was more important 7 18.92%
Shawn Michaels was more important 11 29.73%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 37. You must log in or register to vote on this poll.
1 2 3 4 5 6
wrestling forum>Did Bret Hart do anything important other than The Montreal Screwjob?
Bad News Gertner 10:23 AM 05-17-2018
Bret was just "there"
Reply
Ol Dirty Dastard 10:28 AM 05-17-2018
Davey Boy Smith vs. Reno Riggins
Reply
#1-norm-fan 11:19 AM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by Noid:
I have no clue what you're trying to say here. I mean, I get that you think that Punk was overall better, but I'm saying that I don't think he was. So...okay?

Also, I'm sure the time will come where I will take Reigns over Punk too. I don't really miss Punk at all.
Will you take Reigns over Bret? I was saying your use of "Wembley vs Punk's one buyrate" to determine who was better is flawed.
Reply
#1-norm-fan 11:23 AM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by The Dastardly One:
Yeah I guess they should have just booked Bulldog versus Berzerker. Would have drawn the same.
It would have drawn way more than Bret vs Berzerker.
Reply
LibSuperstar 11:51 AM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan:
It would have drawn way more than Bret vs Berzerker.
Doubt that much more. Nobody wants to see Berzerker in a main event.
Reply
Destor 12:02 PM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan:
It would have drawn way more than Bret vs Berzerker.
Honestly...fair
Reply
Mr. Nerfect 01:55 PM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan:
Will you take Reigns over Bret? I was saying your use of "Wembley vs Punk's one buyrate" to determine who was better is flawed.
Nah, Bret over Reigns. I was just referencing that as one aspect of their game. I think I was severely overrating Punk at the time. I didn't care as much about him as I wanted to even then.
Reply
Loose Cannon 03:25 PM 05-17-2018
Fair point about Wembley. Bulldog does not draw against Berserker though lol.

I will say this, Bret did draw the highest two wrestlemania main events from 91-97. and it wasn't Wrestlemania 12. it was 9 and 10. You could argue the Hogan factor for 9. I was actually surprised buy this

430,000 for 9
420,000 for 10

WM 7 did 400
WM 8 did 390

Maybe people really liked Yoko and Bret
Reply
Loose Cannon 03:26 PM 05-17-2018
WM 13: 237,000. Last place. poor Taker and Sid
Reply
LibSuperstar 03:30 PM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon:
Fair point about Wembley. Bulldog does not draw against Berserker though lol.

I will say this, Bret did draw the highest two wrestlemania main events from 91-97. and it wasn't Wrestlemania 12. it was 9 and 10. You could argue the Hogan factor for 9. I was actually surprised buy this

430,000 for 9
420,000 for 10

WM 7 did 400
WM 8 did 390

Maybe people really liked Yoko and Bret
Gotta look at which match was advertised most.
Reply
Loose Cannon 03:35 PM 05-17-2018
Originally Posted by M.V.W.:
Gotta look at which match was advertised most.
That kind of goes back to what i was saying earlier, i really believe if your name wasn't Hogan, Austin and mayyyyybe Rock, you needed other guys/matches/storylines on the card to help you draw.

In my opinion Austin and Hogan could of drawn wrestling a broom stick while the rest of the card was midgets. At least when they were hot. Rock's a maybe.

And this is just WWF. Obviously Flair in NWA would be another.
Reply
Mr. Nerfect 03:51 AM 05-18-2018
SummerSlam '94 also did much better than SummerSlam '93. 50,000 buys better. The Taker/Faker bullshit was in the main, but Bret was the WWF Champion going against Owen in the cage.
Reply
#1-norm-fan 09:55 AM 05-18-2018
Leslie Goddamn Nielsen was the draw of SummerSlam '94.
Reply
Ol Dirty Dastard 09:59 AM 05-18-2018
Fan I think I've grown to love our feud over the merits Bret Hart.
Reply
Ol Dirty Dastard 09:59 AM 05-18-2018
You fuck.
Reply
Loose Cannon 10:13 AM 05-18-2018
Originally Posted by Noid:
SummerSlam '94 also did much better than SummerSlam '93. 50,000 buys better. The Taker/Faker bullshit was in the main, but Bret was the WWF Champion going against Owen in the cage.
I guess Vince made the right call in not putting the strap on Luger
Reply
#1-norm-fan 10:39 AM 05-18-2018

Reply
Ol Dirty Dastard 10:40 AM 05-18-2018
lol the vignettes were obviously amazing cuz of Nielson but dear god the writing was so bad.
Reply
#1-norm-fan 10:47 AM 05-18-2018
This is a wrestling website and there's a poster named after Nielsen's character. There's no poster named "Bret Hart". Point Nielsen.
Reply
Ol Dirty Dastard 10:50 AM 05-18-2018

Reply
Bad News Gertner 08:23 PM 05-18-2018
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan:
This is a wrestling website and there's a poster named after Nielsen's character. There's no poster named "Bret Hart". Point Nielsen.
You mean there isn't a poster named whiny bitch?
Reply
Mr. Nerfect 09:53 PM 05-18-2018
I think we can all agree that Leslie Nielsen would have been a better World Champion than David Arquette.
Reply
Bad News Gertner 08:24 AM 05-19-2018
He would have drawn more money than Bret ever did
Reply
SenatorJPO 12:55 PM 05-19-2018
Yes, Bret Hart publicized backstage drama like few wrestlers have done since.

He was a primary motivator behind Barry Blaustein's year-2000 film Beyond the Mat.

In this sense, Bret could be seen as a precursor to Total Bellas, Hogan Knows Best, and other pro-wrestling reality programming.

Outside wrestling, Bret sired Blade, Jade, and Alexandra, so "there's that."
Reply
Destor 04:42 PM 05-19-2018
Thats a stretch
Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6
Reply Up