![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Posts: 648
![]()
|
Pay during No-Compete Clause
I don't know how severance pay works in the US or if it would even apply to a wrestling company, but when WWE releases a wrestler, they usually have a 90-day no-compete clause. I was wondering if WWE still pays the wrestler for those 90 days?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pope Is Pimpin'
Posts: 4,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes, That's the whole reason a wrestler accepts that contract. You get paid to sit on your ass and do nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, that, and if you don't accept it you don't get signed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So Paul London must have loved it he could sit at home an smoke all the weed he wanted too. Thank god he never had to lay on the bear skin rug. If you watch there shoot interview you will get what i am talking about.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Posts: 448
|
I don't think for their 90 day no-compete clause that they get paid by the WWE because one would think that the WWE puts that in every wrestlers contract now-a-days.
Though if you get fired from certain jobs they do give you severence depending on how long you've worked there, so who knows. I'm going to say it depends on the wrestler. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No.
A Standard No Compete Clause is used in alot of work places. Like at my office the sales guys sign a 1 year clause meaning if they leave the company they cannot work for a competitor or start their own competing business for 1 year. Same in the WWE. You can work anywhere for 90 days but wrestling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
WWE's 90 day no compete is paid.
It might be the equivalent of severance, I'm not sure, but I know they're paid. The clause only goes into effect if they're fired. If the contract runs out there is no non-compete. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Skibbidy Lock Jaw
Posts: 88,876
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Isn't the no-compete clause only for appearing on televised or PPVed wrestling? Or did they just make an exception for Daniel Bryan because they felt bad about it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pope Is Pimpin'
Posts: 4,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So Vince McMahon basically paid for his weed then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Danielson is only appearing on non-televised and shows. The normal deal is they need to get permission to work anywhere else and it can't be televised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posts: 6,350
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think they get paid, otherwise WWE would be violating SOME kind of law by not letting a person earn an income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
He's Here
Posts: 60,735
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How insightful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Pope Is Pimpin'
Posts: 4,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
VG + Q&A FORUM REPRESENT
Posts: 38,940
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How WWE gets away with what they do to their 'independent contractors' still confuses me to this day. An independent contractor exclusive to a company. I wonder what TNA's approach is. Actually they probably don't know who they are hiring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is a fair chance if a wrestler contacted the IRS and challenged it, they might get in trouble.
That said, there is a fine line and a lot of "IC" actually prefer the 1099's because it allows them more liberals with tax write-offs and deductions. Real estate agents, mortgage lenders and lots of other sales positions are the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They sign a contract
"We will pay you this much salary, and if you are terminated you cannot appear in Wrestling for 90 days" They agree to it, there is no law against it, and it is common in all business. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
unless there was a recent change California was one state that did not allow non-competes to be enforced.
A lot of places get away with it because workers don't know their rights and just follow it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
You can't teach that
Posts: 19,337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It should only matter where the Company headquarters is in. Any WWE contract signed should only be subject to Connecticut law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Pope Is Pimpin'
Posts: 4,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Ron Paul 4 EVA
Posts: 152,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
However, I mostly wanted to snidely remark "but...but that's unfair!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||
|
DU's illegitimate brother
Posts: 3,685
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
That said, yes, we'll assume it's legal in CT, also their contract probably also stipulates any law suites or challenges etc... to the contract must be filed in CT to cover themselves. |
||
|
|
|