![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Posts: 61,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Would this be possible?
I'm not a television expert, but right now the WWE has 8 hours of WWE programming a week. IMO, four of those hours are wasted at the moment. Heat & Velocity are great shows, but their ratings aren't exactly high at the moment (quite frankly RAW & SmackDown!'s are fairly low at the moment, too). WWE Experience, although I really know nothing about it, to my understanding is a two-hour catch-up show. I think Todd Grisham & Ivory host. Anyway, most people think that the slump of things right now is the residue of lack of build-up or the rushed angles. The original plan for the roster split was to give superstars more exposure, and let's face it, if we still had a one unit WWE, guys like Mark Jindrak, Luther Reigns, Randy Orton would never get a chance to shine. I think for the most part the roster split has been successful.
Anyway to the point. Would it be possible for the WWE to work something out with a television network to have two two-hour shows dedicated to each respective brand a week? Do you think it would work? I'd enjoy maybe a two-hour RAW broadcast on Monday nights, then a two-hour Nitro program on Wednesday nights. For the SmackDown! brand, a live two-hour SmackDown! on Tuesday, and a two-hour Velocity on Thursday or Saturday. This would allow for more of a competition thing going on between the two brands, and could establish more superstars, and inseatd of having the re-bounds air on an opposite brand, RAW can recap Nitro and vice-versa. And using this method, the WWE doubles its time to show off superstars, and build-up feuds. PPVs could be held much more often. I think it would be possible for each brand to have a PPV a month with about 16 hours of build-up a month. I could see the PPVs being setup like this: January Royal Rumble (Both) February Road to WrestleMania (RAW) No Way Out (SmackDown!) March WrestleMania (Both) April Backlash (RAW) Judgment Day (SmackDown!) May Bad Blood (RAW) Mayday (SmackDown!) June King of the Ring (Both) July 777 (Both) August Summerslam September Unforgiven (RAW) September to Remember (SmackDown!) October Halloween Havoc (RAW) No Mercy (SmackDown!) November Survivor Series (Both) December Vengeance (RAW) Armageddon (SmackDown!) Anyway, do you think it could work. 8 hours of mainstream WWE programming a week, 4 hours for each brand could really re-build interest in the product, IMO. Pfft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
not gayo
Posts: 7,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This must have been proposed a lot, but here's what my answers are:
Taping shows is much cheaper, so Vince would prefer to save money that way since he favours Raw over Smackdown. This also makes Raw feel like a bigger event since it is live. More PPV's does not equal better programming. People don't like paying so much money for 12 PPV's a year, and since Vince has incorporated some extra ones in the near future, I don't believe they will have much success. The product doesn't need to be watered down so much, and to many people, 4 hours of wrestling a week plus a PPV each month is quite enough. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Posts: 61,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I believe WWE TV breaks down like this:
RAW Brand: RAW (2hr show with A level talent, all angles are done here), Heat (1 hr show with first run B level matches, few if angles are shot here) and Bottom Line (1 Hour recap show) SD Brand SD (2hr show with A level talent, all angles are done here), Velocity (1 hr show with first run B level matches, few if angles are shot here) and After Burn (1 Hour recap show) Then you have the 1 hour Experience show on Sunday mornings which I too have never seen, but understand it recaps both brands with some special packages they used to use on Confidential (ie "SD went to Australia this week here's the highlights") Now, in theory turning 4 of the 5 hours which are pretty much wasted right now into shows with A-level talent and story progression is a good idea. But in theory communism was a good idea, in theory. In reality its a really bad idea. First problem is that I doubt Spike TV will give the WWE two more days to show wrestling in prime time. I mean I know they love the WWE for bringning in what little ratings they get, but at the same time I dont think they want to be known as the WWE Channel. They want to build up their reputation, not bring it down. But even if the WWE could get the better timeslots there would be huge pressures on the already stretched writing team to write 4 more hours of "qaulity" first run TV. I remember a lot of the writers complaining when the WWE added SD to the mix, imagine the problems if they had two more shows to worry about. Finally in all likelyhood this will burn out the fans. One of the reasons they did the brand extension in the first place was because they felt they were burning out talent by having them on two times per week. Now they have stars who aren't nearly as over and you want them to overexpose them? That sounds like suicide to me. What I would rather see them do is to concentrate on making RAW and SD consistantly good, and then maybe make Heat and Velocity worth watching. But until they can do that, they shouldn't even give a seocnd thought to adding more A-level shows. As for the PPVs, I think they are moving towards something like you have listed, where they have shows for each brand every month and then the 4 major shows with talent from both sides. I wouldn't mind seeing KOTR come back, but perhaps only for one of the brands. I say that only because judging from what Vince said at the Mania 21 Press Conference it seems like they want to keep Mania as the only show where RAW guys can face SD in matches (Rumble doesn't count as a macth). If they brought back KOTR as a dual brand show, you would have to make it end with a RAW vs SD finals, and then that hurts the specialness of Mania. I'd also like to see them bring back more WCW PPV titles, and I actually think they may do that down the line. In 05 they have two PPVs scheduled for January (one RAW and the Rumble obviously). I think that RAW show will get pushed back to December in the future (like at the end of 05) and that could easily be called Starrcade. With all the history of that PPV they really should capitalize on it. Havoc should be brought back as one of the October shows. And there's BATB, and Super Brawl which should be used. The other they shows they add in the future can be given stupid WWE created names like Taboo Tuesday. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Posts: 61,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree, talent would be burnt out, and the fans would have trouble keeping up. I like the idea of having Heat and Velocity more watchable. Velocity actually has some of its major talent on its "B" show occasionally. I'd like to see Heat & Velocity become more of an "A" show, by having it as just an extra hour of RAW that airs on Sunday night. Sort of like it not being an insult to be on Heat/Velocity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Before when Heat first started it was a great show, and I remember it doing 4's. Now granted that was before SD was around, but it just takes a little long term planning and you can make as many shows as you want worth watching. But thats one of the big problems, no planning. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Posts: 61,517
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
It's Hammer Time
Posts: 2,207
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My reason against this idea is simple. It's just too much wrestling. I need days off!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
not gayo
Posts: 7,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Takes up too much of my time while I'm in school. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
It's Hammer Time
Posts: 2,207
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes... and on top of that.... all that wrestling would be bound to conflict with my TV watching habits! As it is Raw/Smackdown don't conflict with anything I would watch.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
The Satanic Mechanic
Posts: 52,521
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What time are Heat and Velocity even on (Eastern)? They changed their schedule way back, and then I gave up on watching since Ultimo wasn't on.
|
![]() |
![]() |