DISCUSSION - Could a FACE Christian become RAW's answer to Eddie Guerrero? - Page 2

**Londoner** · 04-21-2005, 06:12 PM

True, though i wasnt into wrestling at the time when rock was a heel, but have some old tapes n shit...so i dunno what the feeling was back then. Though i think Christian could pull off being a proper face.

Kurt Angle is one example of what your talking about though, look when he was heel everyone wanted him to be face, he turned face,and it turned out shit. So, now he's heel again.

**KillerWolf** · 04-21-2005, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThugLife

I bet you felt that way about the Rock to when he was a heel.

yes.

now, obviously we cant have a roster full of just heels. but it is a FACT that the Rock was more entertaining as 'hollywood heel' than as 'hollywood face'. it is also a fact that when a wrestler turns face, their great mic segments lose a lot of their humor, and become more or less pandering to the crowd.

exceptions: Eddie Guerrero, Steve Austin.

**CYCLOPTERSAURUS** · 04-21-2005, 07:24 PM

Christian is a riot. I'm just afraid they'd screw up his gimmick, or make him super-serious or something. Heels are always more entertaining IMO. If the keep his personality as it is now though, it could be cool.

04-21-2005, 06:12 PM	#41
Londoner One Of A Kind Posts: 22,178	True, though i wasnt into wrestling at the time when rock was a heel, but have some old tapes n shit...so i dunno what the feeling was back then. Though i think Christian could pull off being a proper face. Kurt Angle is one example of what your talking about though, look when he was heel everyone wanted him to be face, he turned face,and it turned out shit. So, now he's heel again.

04-21-2005, 07:24 PM	#43
CYCLOPTERSAURUS devastationstudios.com Posts: 2,362	Christian is a riot. I'm just afraid they'd screw up his gimmick, or make him super-serious or something. Heels are always more entertaining IMO. If the keep his personality as it is now though, it could be cool.