![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Ninja Mod, Esquire
Posts: 12,676
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Would fewer major title defenses help the WWE?
What do you think? I started thinking about this when NJPW announced the next challenger for Nagata's IWGP championship. That match isn't happening until 10/8. Mind you his last defense was 7/6. DO you think it would help WWE to build up big title matches like this? Instead of having one every month, have them every other, or every 3rd month even, to make title matchs mean something, have a big fight feel, etc?
I mean, with the Rumble winner getting a title shot, you usually have a bigger fight feel to the Mania match due to the build up, so could they use this idea in general? Plus, it would help to cover the fact that their aren't many main eventers right now. Also, while building up title matches, you could have the champs wrestle other opponents, in singles/tag matches, and slowly give other guys some credibility, instead of the generic "Tag match with opponent involved/squash match against guy my opponent sent after me" build up. I don't know, I think it would work. |
![]() |
![]() |