Give me reasons why the Royal Rumble should remain at 30 participants....

[Nicky Fives]

For the longest time I've wanted the Royal Rumble Match expanded to 40, 50 or even 60 men for numerous reasons..... It is easily the second biggest PPV of the year and now with The Undertaker's streak broken, the most popular "attraction" in WWE. More Superstars means more surprises and more importantly, more time to establish stars by having several dominant performances rather than only a few.

I understand the logistical nightmare of having to coordinate 10-20 more eliminations and having to fill 30+ minutes of airtime (especially with recent criticism of the writing staff), but I cannot see any detriment to having a longer Rumble where the participants enter every 1:30.

So in my perfect world, the PPV would have a preshow match (IC or TT Title Match), the other title match on the main card, followed by a Divas Title Match, WWE Title Match and a good 1.5 hours dedicated to the Rumble Match itself.

Discuss, please.