Hulkamania, Naitch. Hulkamania.

[Xero]

Originally Posted by hulkamania320 Xero, the list of wrestlers that don't need to go over that keep going over has a whole lot more names on it than just Hulk Hogan. And if Randy Ortons character could take losing to the Undertaker at Wrestlemania, he could take losing to Hogan. Not that he SHOULD lose. I just suggested that it would be a good match to see, NO MATTER WHO WON OR LOSE. It is bullshit to say that it isn't a good match if Hullk Hogan wins, or if Randy Orton wins. Damn.

You're right about a lot of the names going over who shouldn't. Undertaker, Triple H, Flair, even Michaels to an extent (although he jobs more than he wins it seems)... I don't think anyone is going to argue with you. And that's ANOTHER point, NONE of these wrestlers should be winning matchs just because it would 'hurt their legacy' if they job once in a while in a big match.

Orton should have NEVER lost to The Undertaker, and that's coming from an Undertaker mark. It was stupid and pointless, even if Orton was going to be out for a few months. They could have had him win and the Undertaker could have destroyed him and put him on the shelf storyline-wise. It hurt Orton a lot more than it helped him.

You're right, it doesn't matter who wins or loses a match. It depends on if the match is GOOD and/or watchable. Hogan's matches do not fall into either of those categories. For example, I don't care if Shawn Michaels OR Kurt Angle wins at Homecoming, the fact is that it's going to be a GREAT match.

And just for the record, Ric Flair has no business holding any title at this stage in his career.